napnap vs Lulla: what napnap does better
Lulla and napnap start from the same idea: fitting the wake windows to the baby instead of reading a table. From there they part ways.
| What | napnap | Lulla |
|---|---|---|
| Days of forecast | 14, with a margin per hour | The next nap and bedtime |
| Nap and night kept apart | Yes, two separate averages | No |
| Length by slot of the day | Yes, each nap with its own | No |
| Feeds with a stopwatch per side | Yes | No |
| Starting solids | A year-long plan, 92 foods | No |
| Open API | Yes, documented | No |
| Siri shortcuts | Yes | No |
| Price | Free, no paid tier | In-app purchases |
Two weeks, not the next nap
napnap projects up to fourteen days with the margin on every hour, which is what it takes to plan a Saturday or a family lunch in advance.
Every nap lasts as long as that nap lasts
The one after the night is not the one after lunch. napnap learns the length by slot of the day: with a single average, a day of 35, 90 and 45 minutes came out as «59» three times over, and wrong all three.
And the night goes separately, by median, so that a small-hours waking recorded as two sleeps does not drag the number.
And the baby's whole day in one place
Feeds with a stopwatch per side and which one to start on, starting solids with its year-long plan, and an open API with Siri shortcuts. Free, with nothing to buy inside.